Rockwell: Life Sciences Hit by Cyberattacks, Poor Data Use Despite Digital Investment
Survey reveals most manufacturers face security risks and poor data usage despite heavy investment in digital transformation technologies.
Key points
- % of life sciences orgs faced cyberattacks in the past year
- Only 32% effectively use more than half of collected data
- AI and automation lead technology investment priorities
Rockwell Automation published findings showing significant gaps in cybersecurity and data readiness among life sciences manufacturers. According to Industrial Cyber, the vendor’s research indicates that while digital transformation is now a business imperative, many organisations struggle to secure their expanding digital operations or utilise the data they collect effectively during this shift.
Root cause
The survey, based on responses from 104 managers and executives across 16 countries, highlights a disconnect between investment and operational maturity. Manufacturers are investing heavily in artificial intelligence, process automation, and cybersecurity to improve quality and reduce risk. However, Rockwell’s report, titled ‘The New Operating Model for Life Sciences Manufacturing’, identifies that these investments often outpace the underlying data readiness and security controls required to support them safely.
Attack path
Exposure points were identified across multiple infrastructure layers. According to the data, 41% of attacks targeted IT systems and enterprise networks, while 33% involved remote access and connected equipment. Another 29% of incidents occurred at IT and operational technology integration points. These vectors suggest that as facilities connect more devices and expand remote capabilities, the attack surface grows, leaving traditional boundaries insufficient against modern threats.
Affected versions
The findings apply broadly to the life sciences manufacturing sector rather than specific software versions. The respondents included leaders from manufacturers, original equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and engineering procurement companies. The data reflects a general industry state where 58% have deployed smart manufacturing technologies at scale or in parts of their operations, yet few have achieved continuous readiness for the associated risks.
Mitigation
Rockwell suggests shifting regulatory readiness from a periodic project to a daily discipline. Matt Weaver, vice president of global industry for life sciences at Rockwell Automation, stated that companies must integrate security and data validation into daily facility operations. This includes securing systems, connecting data responsibly, and validating AI deployments to prepare for future regulatory or market demands.
What to do and how to stay safe: Rockwell Automation
- Review current data collection practices to ensure more than half of gathered data is effectively utilised
- Audit remote access controls and connected equipment for potential exposure points
- Assess IT and OT integration points for security gaps and implement stricter monitoring
- Move cybersecurity from a compliance checklist to a continuous operational discipline
Step-by-step guide: Password Policies Examples That Reduce Password Fatigue
General security guidance from the Vector Bulletin newsroom. It is not confirmed advice from the organisations named in this story.
Frequently asked questions
How many life sciences manufacturers experienced cyberattacks recently?
According to Rockwell’s survey, 54% of life sciences organisations experienced at least one cyberattack in the past year.
What technologies are manufacturers investing in most?
AI and machine learning were cited by 46% of respondents as delivering the biggest outcomes, followed by process automation at 44% and cybersecurity at 39%.
Is digital transformation considered optional in this sector?
No, 90% of life sciences manufacturers consider digital transformation necessary to their business, making it a core imperative rather than a future initiative.




